• Home
  • About Us
    • Our History & Accomplishments
    • Our Leader
    • LMA Gives
    • Photo Gallery
    • Library & Resources
  • Services
    • Assignment of Benefits & Insurance Litigation
    • Associations & Nonprofits
    • Business Development & Procurement
    • Education
    • Energy & Environment
    • Emergency Management
    • Flood Insurance & Resilience
    • Healthcare
    • Insurance/Financial Services
    • Legislative & Regulatory Monitoring
    • Marketing Intelligence
    • Property & Casualty Insurance
    • Public Relations
  • News / Podcasts / Library
  • Conference Room
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our History & Accomplishments
    • Our Leader
    • LMA Gives
    • Photo Gallery
    • Library & Resources
  • Services
    • Assignment of Benefits & Insurance Litigation
    • Associations & Nonprofits
    • Business Development & Procurement
    • Education
    • Energy & Environment
    • Emergency Management
    • Flood Insurance & Resilience
    • Healthcare
    • Insurance/Financial Services
    • Legislative & Regulatory Monitoring
    • Marketing Intelligence
    • Property & Casualty Insurance
    • Public Relations
  • News / Podcasts / Library
  • Conference Room
  • Contact
  • MENU

Florida Supreme Court Changes Rule on Proposals for Settlement

SHARE THIS

By Robert Schulte, Esq.

Robert Schulte, Esq. Courtesy, Scarborough Attorneys At Law

If Helen of Troy was “the face that launched a thousand ships” the proposal for settlement (“PFS”) rule and statute in Florida can perhaps be described as the “law that launched a thousand appeals.” 

Many of the appeals flowed from questions of whether “nonmonetary terms” a party attached to a PFS invalidated it.  For example, on May 25, 2022 Florida First District Court of Appeal ruled that a PFS which included a nonmonetary term demanding that the $1.3 million PFS amount be paid in cash within thirty days was not one which was made in good faith and therefore invalid. State Farm Auto. Ins. Co. v. Lightfoot, Nos. 1D20-2285, 1D20-2303, 2022 Fla. App. LEXIS 3559, (Dist. Ct. App. May 25, 2022).  Earlier this year, the Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal ruled that a release which was included as a nonmonetary term of the PFS did not invalidate it as ambiguous.  Tower Hill Signature Ins. Co. v. Kushch, 335 So. 3d 743 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022).  The Florida Supreme Court in 2016 emphasized that PFSes were “intended to end judicial labor, not create more” and that “courts are discouraged from ‘nitpicking’ proposals for settlement to search for ambiguity.”  Anderson v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 202 So. 3d 846, 853 (Fla. 2016).

Perhaps seeking to terminate one repeat source of alleged ambiguity and gamesmanship, the Florida Supreme Court on May 26, 2022 amended Rule 1.442(c) which set out the “Form and Content of Proposal for Settlement.”  The old version allowed a PFS to include conditions and nonmonetary terms:

(2) A proposal shall:
[…]
(C) state with particularity any relevant conditions;
(D) state the total amount of the proposal and state with particularity all nonmonetary terms of the proposal;

The new version, which takes effect on July 1, 2022 will read:

(2) A proposal shall:
[…]
(C) exclude nonmonetary terms, with the exceptions of a voluntary dismissal of all claims with prejudice and any other nonmonetary terms permitted by statute;
(D) state the total amount of the proposal;

The Court explained that “[t]he amendments are intended to align rule 1.442 with the substantive elements of Florida’s settlement proposal statutes” and would serve to allow a simple comparison of monetary amounts without consideration of nonmonetary conditions, as envisioned by the legislature when they established the PFS statute.

An immediately apparent consequence of this change would be that it appears the long-standing practice of “attaching” a release to a PFS by Defendants as a condition and/or nonmonetary term may no longer be allowed and doing so may render the PFS unenforceable.  Without the protection afforded by a release, Defendants may be limited to relying only upon a dismissal with prejudice to protect them from repeat litigation upon the same claims if their PFS is accepted.

Robert “Bob” Schulte is a partner with Scarborough Attorneys at Law who represents Florida insurers in homeowners and commercial insurance matters.  For more information, please visit http://www.scarboroughattorneys.com

LMA Newsletter of 6-13-22

SHARE THIS

Tags: Florida Supreme Court, Insurance Litigation, Property Insurance Defense, Proposal for Settlement, Robert Schulte, Scarborough Attorneys at Law, State Farm Auto. Ins. Co. v. Lightfoot

“Lisa this is another great newsletter, and we appreciate the time and energy you put into these informative updates – you are on top of these topics!”

Mike Graham, CEO
Smart Vent Products, Floodproofing.com, & Risk Reduction Plus
Juno Beach, FL

“I have followed your weekly newsletter and podcasts and now have a full appreciation for what you bring to this industry.  You are an inspiring force, plain and simple.  I wanted you to know that you make a difference.  Thank you for all you do!”

Jeffrey Karam, CPCU
Bradenton, FL

“Lisa Miller is a true champion for the insurance industry, with her regular updates! We appreciate all you do and keeping us up to date on priority issues!”

Gillian Lloyd, Account Executive
Zywave
Milwaukee, WI

“Thank you Lisa for staying on top of, as well as advocating, for Florida residents and legislative reform. Your newsletters are very informative and enjoy reading the points of view.”  

Shawna Miller, Sr. Claims Quality Assurance & Compliance Manager
Florida Peninsula Insurance Company
Jacksonville, FL

“Just a quick note to let you know how much I have appreciated your newsletter over the years and the assistance they offer for those in the field of claims. We depend on the information more than you will ever know!”

Laurie Rasberry, Chief Claims Officer
Acorn Claims
Prosper, Texas

“Your newsletter is fabulous!  I greatly appreciate the topics you expose, so that insurance professionals like myself can keep up with the latest events that affect the public we serve and ourselves.”

Cynthia Hoehn, Independent Property & Casualty Personal Lines insurance agent
Clermont, FL

“Another great Newsletter on Florida industry this week.  Your service and advocacy in Florida is very important to keeping me updated and apprised of the Florida insurance laws, trends and overall environment.  Something similar is very much needed in Louisiana, too.”

Jennifer Tedesco, Esq., Claims Director
Pharos Claims Services
Orlando, FL

“Great article on Risk Rating 2.0!”

Austin Perez, Senior Policy Representative for Federal Housing, Valuation, Insurance and Commercial Issues
National Association of Realtors
Washington, D.C.

“Just wanted to say that I thoroughly love your newsletter. It’s is always informative and insightful to the ins and outs of our industry.  You are an inspiration and an important asset in the insurance world.  Keep up the great work!” 

Cynthia Scott, President
University Insurance Group
Davie, FL

GET THE LATEST UPDATES IN YOUR INBOX FOR FREE!

SUBSCRIBE NOW

READ THE LATEST LMA NEWSLETTER ONLINE NOW

READ NOW

331 N. Monroe Street
Tallahassee, FL 32301
(850) 222-1041
[email protected]

*DBE certified through affiliate Lisa Miller Consultants

© Copyright 2008 - 2022
Lisa Miller Associates
All Rights Reserved
Managed by SiteBolts