• Home
  • About Us
    • Our History & Accomplishments
    • Our Leader
    • LMA Gives
    • Photo Gallery
    • Library & Resources
  • Services
    • Assignment of Benefits & Insurance Litigation
    • Associations & Nonprofits
    • Business Development & Procurement
    • Education
    • Energy & Environment
    • Emergency Management
    • Flood Insurance & Resilience
    • Healthcare
    • Insurance/Financial Services
    • Legislative & Regulatory Monitoring
    • Marketing Intelligence
    • Property & Casualty Insurance
    • Public Relations
  • News / Podcasts / Library
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our History & Accomplishments
    • Our Leader
    • LMA Gives
    • Photo Gallery
    • Library & Resources
  • Services
    • Assignment of Benefits & Insurance Litigation
    • Associations & Nonprofits
    • Business Development & Procurement
    • Education
    • Energy & Environment
    • Emergency Management
    • Flood Insurance & Resilience
    • Healthcare
    • Insurance/Financial Services
    • Legislative & Regulatory Monitoring
    • Marketing Intelligence
    • Property & Casualty Insurance
    • Public Relations
  • News / Podcasts / Library
  • Contact
  • MENU

Court Reverses Bad Faith Decision

SHARE THIS

By Tom Diana, Esq.

Tom Diana, Esq. Courtesy, Zinober Diana & Monteverde

Once again, Florida’s 4th District Court of Appeals (“DCA”) has allowed litigants to file bad faith lawsuits after an insurer covers a claim and timely pays the full amount of an appraisal award.  This time, in Zaleski v. State Farm, the Court neutered a 2019 change to Florida’s bad faith statute that was supposed to make it more difficult to file such lawsuits.  Instead, the Zaleski decision makes it even easier.

In Zaleski, a water pipe burst causing significant damage inside the home.  State Farm adjusted the claim and tendered an initial payment of $43,708.01.  Shortly thereafter, the insureds’ attorney filed a Civil Remedy Notice (“CRN”) alleging that State Farm violated Florida’s Bad Faith Statute.  The CRN did not specify an amount of money that State Farm could pay to cure the allegations.  Rather, two weeks later, the insureds’ public adjuster submitted an estimate estimating the total loss at $168,575.11.  In response, State Farm acknowledged the estimate and invoked appraisal to resolve the dispute.  The appraisal umpire awarded $163,479.10 in total damages, and State Farm paid the remaining balance owed within a week.  Then, despite having been paid in full for all damages owed under the policy, the insureds filed a bad faith lawsuit against State Farm.

Once in court, the judge granted summary judgment in favor of State Farm based primarily on Florida Statute 624.155(3)(f) which states that a CRN may not be filed within 60 days after appraisal is invoked by any party.  The 4th DCA, however, pointed out that the Zaleski’s filed their CRN before appraisal was invoked by State Farm.  Notably, though, State Farm had no idea there was any dispute until it received the CRN.

In 2019, the legislature passed Senate Bill 714, which was ultimately signed into law by Governor DeSantis.  That Bill included 624.155(3)(f) the intent of which was to “[prohibit] the filing of the notice within a certain timeframe under certain circumstances.”  In addition, the final Bill Analysis states that this section “amends s. 624.155, F.S., to prohibit the filing of a civil remedy notice for a bad faith action under s. 624.155, F.S., within 60 days after the appraisal process outlined in the insurance contract is invoked by any party in a residential property insurance claim.”

Clearly, the use of the term “prohibit” strongly suggests that the law intended to limit an insurer’s bad faith exposure where it honored its contractual obligations.  Given these circumstances, it is especially important for the judiciary to prevent abuses.  In particular, when the legislature acts to quell the onslaught of CRN’s and lawsuits against insurance carriers, the hope is that judges would recognize the intent of a law and rule accordingly.  Instead of restricting CRN’s from being filed, though, Florida Courts continue to encourage bad faith lawsuits to be filed.  Even in circumstances like the Zaleski case presented.

Thus, in the wake of this decision insurers are likely to remove the clause from their policies as there is little incentive to resolve claims through appraisal if it does not avoid a lawsuit.  After all, Zaleski  provided the playbook for attorneys to follow: file a CRN, demand appraisal, and sue for bad faith if the award is $1 more than what the carrier paid originally.

Tom Diana is a Co-Founder of the Zinober Diana & Monteverde law firm with offices in Ft. Lauderdale, St. Petersburg, and Tampa.  Tom is a civil engineer turned lawyer whose main practice areas focus on insurance claims involving engineering and architectural experts, all matters related to construction, and coverage issues related to professional and general liability policies.  Tom can be reached at the St. Petersburg offices of ZDM at [email protected].

LMA Newsletter of 3-29-21

SHARE THIS

Tags: bad faith, Civil Remedy Notice, Florida Homeowners Insurance Market, Florida Property Insurance, Insurance Litigation, Tom Diana, Zaleski v. State Farm, Zinober Diana & Monteverde

“Lisa this is another great newsletter, and we appreciate the time and energy you put into these informative updates – you are on top of these topics!”

Mike Graham, CEO
Smart Vent Products, Floodproofing.com, & Risk Reduction Plus
Juno Beach, FL

“Just a quick note to let you know how much I have appreciated your newsletter over the years and the assistance they offer for those in the field of claims. We depend on the information more than you will ever know!”

Laurie Rasberry, Chief Claims Officer
Acorn Claims
Prosper, Texas

“Your newsletter is fabulous!  I greatly appreciate the topics you expose, so that insurance professionals like myself can keep up with the latest events that affect the public we serve and ourselves.”

Cynthia Hoehn, Independent Property & Casualty Personal Lines insurance agent
Clermont, FL

“Another great Newsletter on Florida industry this week.  Your service and advocacy in Florida is very important to keeping me updated and apprised of the Florida insurance laws, trends and overall environment.  Something similar is very much needed in Louisiana, too.”

Jennifer Tedesco, Esq., Claims Director
Pharos Claims Services
Orlando, FL

“Just wanted to say that I thoroughly love your newsletter. It’s is always informative and insightful to the ins and outs of our industry.  You are an inspiration and an important asset in the insurance world.  Keep up the great work!” 

Cynthia Scott, President
University Insurance Group
Davie, FL

“Thank you Lisa for staying on top of, as well as advocating, for Florida residents and legislative reform. Your newsletters are very informative and enjoy reading the points of view.”  

Shawna Miller, Sr. Claims Quality Assurance & Compliance Manager
Florida Peninsula Insurance Company
Jacksonville, FL

“Great article on Risk Rating 2.0!”

Austin Perez, Senior Policy Representative for Federal Housing, Valuation, Insurance and Commercial Issues
National Association of Realtors
Washington, D.C.

“I have followed your weekly newsletter and podcasts and now have a full appreciation for what you bring to this industry.  You are an inspiring force, plain and simple.  I wanted you to know that you make a difference.  Thank you for all you do!”

Jeffrey Karam, CPCU
Bradenton, FL

“Lisa Miller is a true champion for the insurance industry, with her regular updates! We appreciate all you do and keeping us up to date on priority issues!”

Gillian Lloyd, Account Executive
Zywave
Milwaukee, WI

GET THE LATEST UPDATES IN YOUR INBOX FOR FREE!

SUBSCRIBE NOW

READ THE LATEST LMA NEWSLETTER ONLINE NOW

READ NOW

331 N. Monroe Street
Tallahassee, FL 32301
(850) 222-1041
[email protected]

*DBE certified through affiliate Lisa Miller Consultants

© Copyright 2008 - 2023
Lisa Miller Associates
All Rights Reserved
Managed by SiteBolts